Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nicolae Frunza vs Jakob Sude Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Frunza vs Sude analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicolae Frunza vs Jakob Sude Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Frunza 2 - 0 Sude
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Frunza has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Sude has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Frunza, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sude has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Frunza has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sude has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Frunza has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Sude winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Frunza has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 192/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Sude has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 53/ 35), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 15/ 18).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Frunza winning 2 times and Sude being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Frunza winning 4 and Sude winning 2. The last match between Frunza and Sude was at the Romania F1 (Bucharest), 18-05-2017, Second, Clay with Nicolae Frunza getting the victory 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 7-6(6).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:40:59.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Frunza and Sude have played a deciding set 2 times, with Frunza winning 2 times and Sude 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 4 tiebreaks against each other with Frunza winning 2, and Sude 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Frunza has played against opponents with an average rank of while Sude has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Frunza has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sude has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Frunza has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sude has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
883
Rank
442
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
686
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
63% (217-129)
Career Total W/L
53% (147-131)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nicolae Frunza vs Jakob Sude For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Frunza VS Sude
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Nicolae Frunza | Jakob Sude |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 39 | 34 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:40:59 | 2:40:59 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (160/236) | 61% (153/251) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (117/160) | 73% (112/153) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (41/76) | 48% (47/98) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (6/21) | 33% (4/12) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (92/251) | 33% (78/236) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Jakob Sude
63%
(
82 of
131)
1st Serve %
64%
(
98 of
154)
1
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
8
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
71 of
98)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
49 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
63 of
154)
145
Total Points Won
140
|
||||
| 6-3 6-7(3) 7-5 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Jakob Sude
74%
(
78 of
105)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
61 of
78)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
29 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nicolae Frunza | Jakob Sude |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nicolae Frunza Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Yassine Dlimi
Player
Nicolae Frunza
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Nicolae Frunza
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Yanaki Milev
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Simon Anthony Ivanov
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
103)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
15
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Nicolae Frunza
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
46 of
97)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
61%
(
65 of
107)
1st Serve %
48%
(
34 of
71)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Nikola Kolyachev
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksandr Bielinskyi
Player
Nicolae Frunza
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Nicolae Frunza
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jakob Sude Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Jakob Sude
40%
(
14 of
35)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
11 of
14)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
86%
(
18 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakob Sude
Player
Igor Panin
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakob Sude
Player
Milos Vukovic
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
36%
(
17 of
47)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pietro Schiavetti
Player
Jakob Sude
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Torebko
Player
Jakob Sude
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
42%
(
16 of
38)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakob Sude
Player
Mirko Cutuli
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
19 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakob Sude
Player
Vitali Chvets
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
24%
(
5 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 3-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matej Sabanov
Player
Jakob Sude
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakob Sude
Player
Gibril Diarra
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-5 13-11 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Frunza Vs Sude Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Frunza are available here and Sude photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
